Re: 32-bit vs 64-bit CentOS on 64-bit hardware

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 4/16/07, chrism@xxxxxxxxx <chrism@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I was asked this question today and frankly, I didn't know the answer.
So I thought I'd post it here....

If you don't need to access greater than 4GB RAM, is there any benefit
to running the 64-bit version of CentOS vs the 32-bit one?  That's
assuming, of course, that the target machine utilizes a 64-bit capable
processor.  I hadn't seen any noticeable difference, but I haven't done
any benchmarking either.


If you need to have processes larger than about 2GB you need to use 64
Bit versions of CentOS.

On a desktop machine, the 32-bit version seems preferable since there
are closed source creature comfort apps that are not yet available in
64-bit land, correct?


Correct. While there is multilib to try and eleviate the pain of
this.. I find it and the Debian chroot option both more painful than
they should be.


--
Stephen J Smoogen. -- CSIRT/Linux System Administrator
How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed
in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice"
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux