sda1 - 30Gb primary partition (was the E: drive)
sda2 - 120 Gb primary partition (was my H: drive)
sda3 - 100Mb /boot primary partition
sda4 - Extended partition
sda5 - 4Gb swap partition
sda6 - 145Gb / partition
I was thinking about rearranging the disk to a more conventional layout where /boot is first, swap next, / next and the rest after that. It probably isn't necessary since the drive runs fine (well, almost - last night /boot developed a weirdity in its superblock and I had to recover with the install DVD in rescue mode and using the alternate superblock, but it's back up and running, having survived the boot fsck), but I was wondering if anyone had tried something like this before. Besides, having a backup (or new) /boot might not be a bad idea after last night....
Are there any serious advantages/disadvantages to having /boot in the middle of the disk and / after it?
I was thinking that I could remove the 1 & 2 partitions, recreate them with a hole in between for a (new/replacement) swap, and copy the original partitions to the new locations, then update the grub.conf and voila! (I would hope....)
I'm also wondering about complications from having the swap and / partitions inside the extended partition....
Comments / suggestions / feedback (preferably polite) welcome.
Thanks.
Mark Hull-Richter, Linux Kernel Engineer
DATAllegro (www.datallegro.com)
85 Enterprise, Second Floor, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656
949-680-3082 - Office 949-330-7691 - fax
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
