On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 04:32:18PM -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: centos-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx > > [mailto:centos-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Luciano > > Miguel Ferreira Rocha > > Sent: Monday, April 09, 2007 4:26 PM > > To: centos@xxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: Re: VMWare vs Parallels, and Zen > > > > On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 04:17:29PM -0400, Miark wrote: > > > I've seen several references to running VMWare under CentOS, but > > > does anybody know how well Parallels runs under CentOS? > > > > Parallels is Mac only. > > There is a version of Parallels for Linux too. Ah. The google add sent me directly to the mac version (and me a ppc), with only a small url to the main page. :/ > I think the VMware workstation is more mature, but costs more $$$ Also, if I read the specs correctly, Parallels require VT/Pacifica, whilest VMWware doesn't. (Xen also requires those, for HVM guests): > Xen is really for those who are willing to get their hands dirty. VMware > server is free and runs well. I agree completly. Alas, my budget doesn't allow testing of Xen enterprise solutions (VirtualIron and Xen Enterprise), so I don't know how they compare to ESX. Has anyone given those a try? -- lfr 0/0
Attachment:
pgphWLOmPre7e.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
