On 4/7/07, DamianS <dsteward@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 2007-04-08 at 12:14 +1000, Andy wrote: > On Sunday 08 April 2007 03:00, centos-request@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > I wonder if this is one of the most anticipated releases or if it just feels > > like it is. Either way the mirrors should be getting hammered when it's out. > > I suspect this release is widely and eagerly anticipated. There will be many our here like me who are looking to migrate to a stable, long-term upgradeable distro that comes with a specification that is not far behind the latest "cool but buggy" efforts. Some people want a Linux to experiment with, others need one they can rely on to earn a living. CentOS 5 looks like it should fit the bill. > Not wishing to put a dampener on things, but I don't think CentOS 5 will be any more eagerly anticipated than CentOS 4 or CentOS 3. And as for 'cool but buggy', there are still many people who consider the 2.6 kernel is not yet up to production standard, and insist on using 2.4
Heck 2.4 is crap. I am using my 2.2 systems for the important work -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- CSIRT/Linux System Administrator How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice" _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
