On Apr 3, 2007, at 21:47, JJ Scott wrote:
[root@localhost /]# rpm -qf /usr/include/linux/unistd.h
kernel-headers-2.6.18-8.el5
[root@localhost /]# cat /usr/include/linux/unistd.h
#ifndef _LINUX_UNISTD_H_
#define _LINUX_UNISTD_H_
/*
* Include machine specific syscallX macros
*/
#include <asm/unistd.h>
#endif /* _LINUX_UNISTD_H_ */
Looks like the _syscall[0-6] macros no longer exist in RHEL 5/CentOS
5. So, what does that mean if you want to use something like gettid
() that requires it (or something equivalent)? The following man
pages reference _syscall[0-6] on a CentOS 4.4 system (I don't have
access to a CentOS 5 beta system from home, but I'll be checking it
tomorrow):
/usr/share/man/man2/clone.2.gz
/usr/share/man/man2/getdents.2.gz
/usr/share/man/man2/gettid.2.gz
/usr/share/man/man2/intro.2.gz
/usr/share/man/man2/llseek.2.gz
/usr/share/man/man2/mmap2.2.gz
/usr/share/man/man2/modify_ldt.2.gz
/usr/share/man/man2/pivot_root.2.gz
/usr/share/man/man2/readdir.2.gz
/usr/share/man/man2/setup.2.gz
/usr/share/man/man2/sysctl.2.gz
/usr/share/man/man2/syslog.2.gz
/usr/share/man/man2/tkill.2.gz
A quick search on the Red Hat Bugzilla system did not find anything
on this topic. It sure does smell like an upstream bug/issue/
something to me...
Alfred
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
