thad wrote:
It is a matter of record [53] that IBM's approach to LVM was
rejected by Linus Torvalds in favor of a different approach.
Accordingly, even if we were to stipulate that IBM had access to old
SCO's LVM technology, any attempted misappropriation came to naught.
That was a different matter; EVMS vs LVM. And even there Linus was and
is wrong. The Linux implementation is "good enough" and linux as an OS
can probably live with it. It is just a little sad that "good enough" is
enough sometimes, esp. when the alternative is not harder to implement.
But this is getting pretty off-topic.
--
//Morten Torstensen
//Email: morten@xxxxxxxxxxx
//IM: Cartoon@xxxxxxxxx morten.torstensen@xxxxxxxxx
And if it turns out that there is a God, I don't believe that he is
evil. The worst that can be said is that he's an underachiever.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
