John R Pierce wrote: > Morten Torstensen wrote: >> >> I would think that Oracle would run pretty much out of the box on >> RHEL5 (and CentOS 5), as the kernel/glibc is not bleeding edge and >> Redhat works pretty close with Oracle (as they do with other >> Enterprise software). That does not mean it is ready for production, >> but it should be ready for testing and piloting. >> > > indeed, I've heard Oracle flat out won't support you if you're running > on CentOS 4, even tho its functionally nearly identical to RHEL4 which > is supported. > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > Hope this doesnt start too much of a flamewar, but I have to ask... If you can afford an Oracle license, why not just buy a RHEL license? >From my limited understanding, Centos is a rebuild of one variant of RHEL. RHEL has at least three different versions; Desktop, Advanced and Server. I couldn't find anything on the centos.org page about which of the variants the source is rebuilt from. maybe a collect of all? just my $0.02 _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos