Re: Wait for 5 or just use 4.4?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



John Plemons wrote:
You know the CPU might make a big difference if he were running Windows, but we're running Linux, an performance wise the Dual Core running Linux, will keep up with if not kick butt on a Dual Zeon running Windows 2003 server. Windows by design is a CPU hog, heck it takes several Windows boxes if you listen to Windows tech's to do the same thing as a single Linux box. Microsoft guy's would prefer to have DNS on one box, mail on another and web services on still a third, throw in a SQL db and well add in another Windows server.

I don't know how many times, I've heard from hired Microsoft guru's tell me I can do that, it needs to be on it's own machine.

This isn't so much about performance as the fact that they are always terrified (and often correctly so...) that one application will affect the others in some mysterious way. Or that a future update needed for one application will be incompatible with one or more of the others. Not only that, they need a test box to match each production box since it is rare for a windows app to be able to run different versions of itself at the same time for testing.

--
  Les Mikesell
   lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux