Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: > RAID5/6 on > systems backed up to tape (oops, I seem to be crossing threads) > fulfills those requirements. No, you're not crossing threads, you're crossing tapes! :) What's wrong with NV anyway?? Mark _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: software raid
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: "'CentOS mailing list'" <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: software raid
- From: Mark Schoonover <schoon@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 19:42:31 -0000
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- Prev by Date: Re: software raid
- Next by Date: Re: RHEL4 - which yum version?
- Previous by thread: Re: Re: software raid
- Next by thread: Thanks to the list for 3ware RAID info...
- Index(es):
 |