Leonardo Pinheiro wrote: > I am sorry, I couldn't understand the Mutt part. Does that mean you've > been using Mutt? :-) > > How good is it? Very. But you want to use the development version (1.5.14 at the moment). > Any comments on the differences (productivity, mail filtering, etc) > from the graphical mail clients? Why do you use it? Because it is the most versatile and configurable mail client which is out there. I don't know of any other mail client coming close to the features mutt has. Though it still stinks in some parts. As Michael Elkins said 12 years ago: ``All mail clients suck. This one just sucks less.'' -me, circa 1995 And that is just true. Still. But they really could release 1.6.x, as 1.4.x is just too old and misses many imap features (and header caching) which 1.5.x already has. Oh, before someone hits me: Yes, Gnus is the one mail client which can do all the stuff mutt can't. But it needs Emacs as its operating system. Ralph
Attachment:
pgptFdZkBwS9l.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
