John R Pierce wrote:
Mike McCarty wrote:
Isn't cached swap somewhat an oxymoron? Why cache virtual?
Am I misunderstanding this line from top?
Swap: 524120k total, 80760k used, 443360k free, 73448k cached
Mike
its not cached swap, they just put the cached on the end of the swap
line because it fits.
Then it should read:
Swap: 524120k total, 80760k used, 443360k free; Cached: 73448k
I'll say this, its not often I see swap used > cached. that machine
definately could use more memory.
I have 256MB total, yes. Want to donate to the fund? Guaranteed
not tax deductible.
Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
Oppose globalization and One World Governments like the UN.
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
