Re: Upgraded BackupPC (3.0.0) in the Testing Repository

[Phil Schaffner <Philip.R.Schaffner@xxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 16:21 -0500, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 09:32 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> > I do not disagree with this at all ... however, there is much
> > documentation written that becomes worthless if I change those aspects
> > of the program (location of config files, and logs, etc.).
> > 
> > I certainly could change all those things (I did add 64bit arch support,
> > for example) ... but I do not want to also then rewrite all docs, etc.
> 
> I don't want to be an ass, but couldn't you use sed or something to
> speed that up?

A don't want to be an a$$ either, but I suspect Johnny has plenty of
other things on his plate of higher priority (recent new errata kernels,
seamonkey re-updates, CentOS5 Beta, ...) as I'm sure does Dag who
complained about the mixed case "violations" in the first place.  From
my experience with sed/awk/etc. it would take a bit of cut-and-try to
get it right.  Perhaps a volunteer with a dislike for the mixed case
names and some free time can step up to the job.  ("Not I" said the
pig ...  :-)

Phil


_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos