Re: Upgraded BackupPC (3.0.0) in the Testing Repository

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 16:21 -0500, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 09:32 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> > I do not disagree with this at all ... however, there is much
> > documentation written that becomes worthless if I change those aspects
> > of the program (location of config files, and logs, etc.).
> > 
> > I certainly could change all those things (I did add 64bit arch support,
> > for example) ... but I do not want to also then rewrite all docs, etc.
> 
> I don't want to be an ass, but couldn't you use sed or something to
> speed that up?

A don't want to be an a$$ either, but I suspect Johnny has plenty of
other things on his plate of higher priority (recent new errata kernels,
seamonkey re-updates, CentOS5 Beta, ...) as I'm sure does Dag who
complained about the mixed case "violations" in the first place.  From
my experience with sed/awk/etc. it would take a bit of cut-and-try to
get it right.  Perhaps a volunteer with a dislike for the mixed case
names and some free time can step up to the job.  ("Not I" said the
pig ...  :-)

Phil


_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux