On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 09:24 -0500, Drew Weaver wrote: > Well, possibly; but there are at least 4 different bugs in the > current 4.4 tree that cause numerous issues with the most basic Intel > hardware and no matter how much they get reported, they are still > constantly ignored, but I guess the same bugs are present with the > upstream; so its ok then. > > -Drew You are correct ... if the bug is upstream ... and if we CLONE the upstream package ... so that our distribution ACTS and WORKS exactly LIKE upstream ... WHICH IS OUR _MAIN_GOAL_ ... and the whole purpose of this frickin distribution ... then: YES IT IS OK THEN. Please read this: http://www.centos.org/modules/tinycontent/index.php?id=5 If you have problems comprehending any of it, please ask for clarification. Thanks, Johnny Hughes > > -----Original Message----- > From: centos-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:centos-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On > Behalf Of Will McDonald > Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 9:19 AM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: CentOS 4.4 on Dell PE 6400 - not rebooting ... > > On 21/02/07, Drew Weaver <drew.weaver@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Im sure at least one person on this list will reply with "Omg, i have > > that same box and have had no problems, you're dumb!!!" > > > > I get it every time I interact with someone from CentOS > > Then they would appear to be correct in at least some of their > assumptions. > > Will. > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
