Johnny Hughes a écrit :
> On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 12:06 +0100, D Ivago wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was just wondering if I should reboot some servers that are running
>> over 180 days?
>>
>> They are still stable and have no problems, also top shows no zombie
>> processes or such, but maybe it's better for the hardware (like ext3
>> disk checks f.e.) to reboot every six months...
>>
>
> I only reboot on kernel upgrades, that is usually more often than 6
> months. But if you don't need to reboot for that reason, I would not
> reboot at all.
>
kernel and glibc.
>
>> btw this uptime really confirms me how stable Centos 4.x really is
>> and so I wonder how long some people's uptimes on the list are ;)
>>
>> rmc
>>
>
> You should consider upgrading your kernels when security updates come
> out ... just to be safe. Especially for machines touching the internet.
>
> I usually upgrade my kernels because I like to use LVM snapshots for
> backups and that has only really started working semi-well since 4.3 and
> even better in 4.4 ... so most of my machines get rebooted every new
> kernel, which is at least 2-3 times a year (sometimes more often).
>
> That being said, I do have a non internet facing machine that has not
> been rebooted since it was installed with CentOS-4.0 on it one March 1,
> 2005. It is an internal router on my employer's infrastructure, and has
> been up for almost 2 years (and was installed on the day before CentOS-4
> was officially released).
>
> Thanks,
> Johnny Hughes
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
