Les Mikesell wrote:
You'd have slightly better performance if you put / and swap on the
first drive and make /var a RAID1 with the other two drives. You'll
have better fail-over protection if you use 2 drives with all partitions
mirrored. You'll have to decide which is more important.
You can also mirror with all three drives. Linux LVM mirroring is still
at a stone age level, but you can use md to mirror.
Reserve the first 100MB on each drive for /boot, then make two equal
size partitions on each drive for md raid. Disk1-P1 mirrors Disk2-P1,
Disk2-P2 mirrors Disk3-P1 and Disk1-P2 mirrors Disk3-P2. Now define all
as PVs and add them to one or more VGs. Depending on how you spread the
load, there could be potential performance bottlenecks, but you can now
use all the space on all three drives.
It would be better and more flexible if LVM could map multiple PEs to a
single LE, but alas that is not the path the LVM guys chose. They are
too stuck in the DOS partition table paradigm I think and think of
filesystems/LVs as the smallest logical block.
In case you are not familiar with LVM terminology:
VG: Volume Group, a collection of storage space for use
PV: Physical Volume, storage space from a disk or partition
PE: Physical Extent, a block of storage from a VG
LE: A Logical Extent, where you actually define a LV (if Linux LVM
supported PE mapping)
LV: A Logical Volume, where you create filesystems, swap space or raw
devices.
--
//Morten Torstensen
//Email: morten@xxxxxxxxxxx
//IM: Cartoon@xxxxxxxxx morten.torstensen@xxxxxxxxx
And if it turns out that there is a God, I don't believe that he is evil.
The worst that can be said is that he's an underachiever.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
