On Fri, 2007-02-02 at 14:48 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > One think I don't understand in all this Johnny. See below... > > Johnny Hughes wrote: > > On Fri, 2006-10-27 at 09:06 -0400, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote: > > > >> On Fri, 2006-10-27 at 09:01 -0400, Jerry Geis wrote: > >> > >>> I just did. I am very confused. I download the firefox-2.0.tar.gz > >>> Untared it and the readme.txt was one sentence. nothing useful. > >>> There is no install**** anything. > >>> > >> Here's the install procedure: > >> > >> 1. Download firefox tar.gz > >> 2. Unpack > >> > >> That's it. Well, you could go further and put firefox in /usr/local (for > >> example), and set up symlinks or something to get firefox 2.0 to run (or > >> use the alternatives system to have both installed on your box). > >> > >> Hope hat helps a bit! > >> > > > > Right ... it is not an RPM, and it is pre-compiled. > > > > I put mine in /usr/lib/firefox-2.0 and did an ln -s > > of /usr/lib/firefox-2.0/firefox to /usr/bin/firefox > > > > I then copied the plugin in /usr/lib/firefox-2.0/plugins > > to /usr/lib/mozilla/plugin and then removed /usr/lib/firefox-2.0/plugins > > and created a ln -s from /usr/lob/mozilla/pligins > > to /usr/lib/firefox-2.0/plugins. > > > Why did you move the plugin out of 2.0/plugin, then create a symbolic > link back there??? This is not computing for me. because /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins is where many things put plugins ... I just put them all in there and sym linked that where firefox-2.0 wanted it to be.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
