-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 11:23:52PM -0600, Barry Brimer wrote:
> >Anyone else using CFS on CentOS 4.4 ?
> >I have started using it today (unimportant stuff for now, for testing),
> >and am wondering what are other people experiences with it.
> >
> >I'm using version 1.4.1, rpms kindly provided by Karan on his repository.
> >
> >My main concern is data loss, not security itself. From what I noticed,
> >the strenght of CFS crypto is less than optimal.
> >
> >CFS right now looks like a very convenient solution. Much easier than the
> >losetup stuff (which is a PITA).
>
> I have not tried TrueCrypt yet, only read about it. Maybe it would be
> useful as well.
> <http://www.truecrypt.org>
PITA. Needs the kernel source to compile.
Which might (probably) indicate you will need to recompile it
whenever you upgrade your kernel.
Anyway, read about it, and it sounds interesting. But a little bit too
much for my current needs.
Tkx for the pointer. I might check it again in the future.
[]s
- --
Rodrigo Barbosa
"Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur"
"Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted (Wyld Stallyns)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFws5QpdyWzQ5b5ckRAuJ5AJ0WdbiyM2p+oRh+cH+jKqLrg5nYRQCgk2J3
Lhdu9nEow8a3V4TQ7LOXKKE=
=0wDn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
