Re: performance lost in using a software raid array with only 1 disk

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Feizhou spake the following on 1/31/2007 7:09 AM:
> Jerry Geis wrote:
>> Is there any performance lost in using a software raid array
>> with only 1 disk?
>>
>> I was wanting to use the mdadm monitoring tools to monitor the
>> machines single disk drive for failures and such. Is there any
>> performance hit for such a setup?
> 
> I assume you are talking about RAID1 arrays. No, you won't. Rather, you
> will get a performance loss if you carve up your disk into more than one
> partition.
> 
>>
>> Some machines have RAID some machines dont (for me) and
>> I was thinking about a common setup.
>>
>> Also then if I want in the future I can actually just add the second
>> disk and now I have RAID.
> 
> I don't think you can actually build an array with missing disks.
Yes, you can build an array with missing disks, and you shouldn't see much
write difference with a missing drive in raid1, but might see a lower read
performance (lower than having the raid array, but near equal to a single
non-raid drive). With software raid5, you usually see some degradation with
both write and read.

-- 

MailScanner is like deodorant...
You hope everybody uses it, and
you notice quickly if they don't!!!!

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux