RE: dhcpd errors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 14:36 -0500, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
> If you are using Cisco switches make sure that you have "spanning-tree
> portfast" set for each PC/thinclient port, otherwise the spanning-tree
> protocol negotiation phase might step on the DHCP offers.

Ah, yes, the infamous spanning-tree problem.  That stupid thing has
driven quite a few people nuts.
In my case it's not so simple.  The switches aren't by Cisco, and
they're unmanaged. 

Also, everything was working flawlessly before - I don't know what's
changed besides the new cabling.

I wonder if it could be a routing problem.  I'll have to look into it
more.

Regards,

Ranbir



-- 
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.18-1.2869.fc6 i686 GNU/Linux 
16:26:45 up 4 days, 2:04, 2 users, load average: 0.06, 0.18, 0.25 


_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux