Re: Good value for /proc/sys/vm/min_free_kbytes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Quoting Martin Knoblauch <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:

Hi,

 what would be a good value for

/proc/sys/vm/min_free_kbytes

 on a Dual-CPU EM64T System with 8 GB of memory. Kernel is
2.6.9-42.0.3.ELsmp. I know that the default might be a bit low.
Unfortunatelly the documentation is a bit weak in this area.

 We are experiencing responsiveness problems (and higher than expected
load) when the system is under combined memory+network+disk-IO stress.

Actually, under similar load, I experinced ext3 file system corruption (RHEL4/CentOS4 kernels). In my case it was memory+cpu+network. All I was doing was running a simple Perl script. For details check out:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202955

Appernetly, Red Hat considers increasing default value for min_free_kbytes in update 5.

Increasing it to 8192 seems to do good job in preventing Linux kernel to deny memory to itself (and destroying my valuable data). Well, at least in my case.


_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux