Re: [CentOS] tar vs. star vs. something-else-I-don-t-know-about

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 11/15/06, Alexey Loukianov <aloukianov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello all,

today I've been sitting at work and upgrading a very-very-very old
server with RedHat Linux 6.2 installed up to CentOS 3.8. The process
went smoothly, as it is not the first time I was doing the things like
this. Just after upgrading I went to rpm -qai list and got an
interesting observation: there are at least two "tar" utilities installed
on the system.

One is tar, and second is star.

Tar is the one you'll likely run into the most. Star is similar to
tar, but has ACL support, so if you're using extended ACL support
(requires a mount option to the file system) you get to keep all the
fine grained permissions. This applies to about 1% of the user
population*.

* This statistic was yanked directly from the southern orifice and
should not in any way be considered accurate

Mostly, learn tar first as it is what nearly everything uses and expects.


--
During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.
George Orwell
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux