On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 21:41 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 01:06:36AM +0000, Karanbir Singh wrote: > > Wedid ff-1.5 for a while, before upstream dropped it into the base os. > > And we might be able to do something similar with ff-2. > > I'm not sure it'd be a good idea in this case. Before, upstream was at least > maintaining a package in Fedora; this time around, it's being skipped. > I think it is in (/ going to be in) RAWHIDE (or FC development ... whichever term you prefer). I think the issue is that much of the current FC is being built against FireFox-1.5 so they are not going to change it in a released product. It should be in their next FC though. (This is just my opinion and conjecture ... not to be confused with an official Fedora policy :P) However, we don't have that issue in CentOS-4 ... as we build against SeaMonkey (mozilla) and not Firefox directly. I am using firefox-2 on C4 with zero issues (that I can ascertain at this point anyway :P) Thanks, Johnny Hughes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
