On Tue, 2006-11-07 at 00:59 -0200, Rodrigo Barbosa wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Up until now, I have been using drbd for file custers with great success. > Yes, it is a PITA, and sometimes you can get annoying sincronization > issues (mostly on lab situations). > > Now I have been considering giving gnbd (with cs/gfs) a try. > > Do any of you ever crossed this path ? Any comparisons or comments ? I use drbd, but that is because I am doing exactly what it was designed for (creating a backup, failover server ... setting side-by-side with a crossover cable in case of server failure). I have no experience using gnbd for that, so I really can't comment on whether it might be better. Thanks, Johnny Hughes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
