Re: [CentOS] gnbd vs drbd

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



I have used GNBD for xen migration and works like a champ and is also
recommended by xen team. I dont know if that helps.

On 11/7/06, Rodrigo Barbosa <rodrigob@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Up until now, I have been using drbd for file custers with great success.
Yes, it is a PITA, and sometimes you can get annoying sincronization
issues (mostly on lab situations).

Now I have been considering giving gnbd (with cs/gfs) a try.

Do any of you ever crossed this path ? Any comparisons or comments ?

TIA,

- --
Rodrigo Barbosa
"Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur"
"Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted (Wyld Stallyns)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFT/Z1pdyWzQ5b5ckRAiXlAJ9gAJNtx7amdZJ2gKfAsxmRSCm/zwCfYy9D
zr7kN3JjBz1HY/5zgT0ylq8=
=6FOA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux