nopers. that will only price legit users out of hte market and e-mail
will be nearly 100% spam after that.
DamianS wrote:
On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 22:24 -0500, Aleksandar Milivojevic wrote:
chrism@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
I wish the penalties for polluting the internet were half as potent as
those for polluting the ocean. Perhaps then we'd see some improvement.
There's no way to block 100% of spam. There are tools and techniques to
block some of it. There are some RFC drafts that might prevent spammers
to use your domain as sender's address (but this is mostly thing of the
future, if those drafts ever get widely deployed standards). And that's
about it.
There is a way to block 99% of spam though.
That solution is for ISPs to start charging money for each email sent!
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
--
My "Foundation" verse:
Isa 54:17 No weapon that is formed against thee shall prosper; and
every tongue that shall rise against thee in judgment thou shalt
condemn. This is the heritage of the servants of the LORD, and their
righteousness is of me, saith the LORD.
-- carpe ductum -- "Grab the tape"
CDTT (Certified Duct Tape Technician)
Linux user #322099
Machines:
206822
256638
276825
http://counter.li.org/
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos