RE: [CentOS] Write performance with 3ware 9550

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 at 4:22pm, Bowie Bailey wrote
> 
> > I have two identical servers.  The only difference is that the first
> > one has Maxtor 250G drives and the second one has Seagate 320G
> > drives. 
> > 
> > OS: CentOS-4.4 (fully patched)
> > CPU: dual Opteron 280
> > Memory: 16GB
> > Raid card: 3ware 9550Sx-8LP
> > Raid volume: 4-disk Raid 5 with NCQ and Write Cache enabled
> > 
> > On the first server I have decent performance.  Nothing spectacular,
> > but good enough.  The second one has about 1/3 the write speed.  I
> > can't find any difference between the systems.  Both of them have
> > the same stripe size, both have ext3 filesystems, both have write
> > caching and NCQ turned on.  I have already increased the read ahead
> > setting to 16384 on both servers.
> 
> Turn off NCQ.  Last I knew, this was still 3ware's recommendation.

I can try that, but when I tested on the first server, I found that
disabling NCQ increased the read performance by 10M/s and decreased
the write performance by 10M/s.  Maybe I'll get different results from
the Seagate drives.

-- 
Bowie
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux