On Sat, 2006-10-07 at 07:20 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote: > Kjeldgaard Morten wrote: > > Thanks. On rpmforge, fftw ver. 3.* is called fftw3. It is really > > pretty bad practice to distribute version 3 as a simple upgrade to > > fftw ver. 2.* when the two versions are not compatible, and the API > > has changed... > > But you're barking up the wrong tree: fftw is not an application which > comes with CentOS, you should take that to the rpmforge users list. > > BTW: kbs-CentOS-Extras still has the fftw2 version (and it's still > called fftw there). > > Ralph Just for the record (and as Ralph said) ... fftw is not at all part of CentOS ... or RHEL ...
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
