Steve Bergman wrote: > In that case, why not use the blazingly fast ext2? Hmmm, good idea. I hadn't thought to take a step back. Thanks. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Calling All FS Fanatics
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [CentOS] Calling All FS Fanatics
- From: Kirk Bocek <t004@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 14:44:55 -0700
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <1159910592.3042.69.camel@localhost>
- References: <4521A3B2.7070709@xxxxxxxxxx> <4522B6B6.1070206@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4522D18E.4040508@xxxxxxxxxx> <1159910592.3042.69.camel@localhost>
- User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909)
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [CentOS] Calling All FS Fanatics
- From: Steve Bergman
- Re: [CentOS] Calling All FS Fanatics
- References:
- [CentOS] Calling All FS Fanatics
- From: Kirk Bocek
- Re: [CentOS] Calling All FS Fanatics
- From: Nathan Grennan
- Re: [CentOS] Calling All FS Fanatics
- From: Kirk Bocek
- Re: [CentOS] Calling All FS Fanatics
- From: Steve Bergman
- [CentOS] Calling All FS Fanatics
- Prev by Date: Re: [CentOS] Calling All FS Fanatics
- Next by Date: Re: [CentOS] Calling All FS Fanatics
- Previous by thread: Re: [CentOS] Calling All FS Fanatics
- Next by thread: Re: [CentOS] Calling All FS Fanatics
- Index(es):
 |