Re: [CentOS] Calling All FS Fanatics

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Kirk Bocek wrote:
Feizhou wrote:
The thing is, I do not see a lot of stuff going on with JFS on LKML.
reiser v3 bugs pop up now and then, XFS had spats going on and ext3 is
rather lack luster and still gets reports now and then. Upstream going
with ext3 is rather expected since Redhat is the backer of ext3 just as
Suse is behind reiser v3.

Okay, so Feizhou is of the glass-is-half-empty school of filesystems. :)

Joshua says he has been using XFS for years. Can anyone else share
anecdotes regarding XFS? Anyone else happy with it?

Is your process even disk throughput bound? If not, you may be agonizing over a decision that needn't even be taken if the "tried and true" and default supported file system (ext3) is "fast enough" to avoid becoming a bottleneck.

That's where I find myself so I've taken the easy way out, for now, and have stuck with the standard file system.

Cheers,

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux