On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 10:59:10AM +0800, John Summerfield wrote: > It's not all loss. I have a small benchmark written in Perl to exercise > the CPU a little. [...] > use integer; This excercises the CPU only a very, very little -- a tight loop of integer math with no system calls or anything. Change this to do floating point math and watch what happens. -- Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/> _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Kernel ELsmp vs EL
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [CentOS] Kernel ELsmp vs EL
- From: Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 10:05:05 -0400
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <4500DC7E.5010406@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <A5A8ECB25D671B4DAD452F0E953CD66601F1814A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <302ce8b50609071843wf948d44u6535635ab7867c5f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4500DC7E.5010406@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [CentOS] Kernel ELsmp vs EL
- From: J.J. Garcia
- Re: [CentOS] Kernel ELsmp vs EL
- References:
- RE: [CentOS] Kernel ELsmp vs EL
- From: Sebastien Tremblay
- Re: [CentOS] Kernel ELsmp vs EL
- From: Jim Perrin
- Re: [CentOS] Kernel ELsmp vs EL
- From: John Summerfield
- RE: [CentOS] Kernel ELsmp vs EL
- Prev by Date: [CentOS] Command ls blocked on usbdrive
- Next by Date: [CentOS] Taring up the OS - how to exclude directories
- Previous by thread: Re: [CentOS] Kernel ELsmp vs EL
- Next by thread: Re: [CentOS] Kernel ELsmp vs EL
- Index(es):
 |