On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 08:46 -0400, William L. Maltby wrote: > On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 07:40 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 08:24 -0400, William L. Maltby wrote: > > > On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 08:21 -0400, William L. Maltby wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 09:50 +0200, David Hrbáč wrote: > > > > > Benjamin Karhan napsal(a): > > > > > > <snip> > > > > > For others who may have missed it and not yet been victimized > > > > > > > > http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2006-August/069073.html > > > > > > > > warns you that your key may have been changed and you should check it. > > > > > > > > Now I know why the list grows ever larger with repetition. > > > > > > As long as I'm in my cranky mood > > > > > > locate rpmsave|grep named > > > /var/named/chroot/etc/named.conf.rpmsave > > > > > > > <snip> > > > > > > > Bill ... I did ask in a previous post to someone else ... : > > > > do you have caching-nameserver installed? > > # yum list installed \*name\* > Installed Packages > caching-nameserver.noarch 7.3-3 installed > perl-XML-NamespaceSupport.noarch 1.08-6 installed > > > <snip sig stuff> > caching-nameserver SHOULD_NOT_BE_ installed on a nameserver that is used to control zones as it _WILL_REPLACE config files _EVERY_TIME_ ... _BY_DESIGN_. Sorry for the caps, but this continuously comes up ... hoping to draw attention to it for future reference :) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=145244 Thanks, Johnny Hughes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
