Ed Morrison wrote: > >>nameserver 192.168.1.4 > >>nameserver 65.106.1.196 > >>nameserver 65.106.7.196 > > > >And those servers are reachable by you? Can you ping them? > > Yes they are available: > > [root@ftp ~]# ping 65.106.1.196 > > --- 65.106.1.196 ping statistics --- > 5 packets transmitted, 4 received, 20% packet loss, time 4006ms > [root@ftp ~]# ping 65.106.7.196 > PING 65.106.7.196 (65.106.7.196) 56(84) bytes of data. > --- 65.106.7.196 ping statistics --- > 3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2003ms What about 192.168.1.4? Is there a name server running on that? You know that the latter ones are only taken into resolving if the first one isn't reachable? Ralph PS: Please trim your mails. -- Ralph Angenendt......ra@xxxxxxxxxxxx | .."Text processing has made it possible Bayerischer Rundfunk...80300 München | ....to right-justify any idea, even one Programmbereich.Bayern 3, Jugend und | .which cannot be justified on any other Multimedia.........Tl:089.5900.16023 | ..........grounds." -- J. Finnegan, USC
Attachment:
pgpxXl2tMd1S1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
