Hi Alain, Alain Reguera wrote:
Thanks, Karan. Feel your kindness here. I really would like to know someone who can clear this to me,
your lawyer should be able to help surely ?
Our question was, why continue using something that they don't want we use, even in a rebuild from them?, but even worst when we reached to love them?. (please, no offence here)
I dont understand your question. Who is the 'they' and who is the 'we', and who do you love ?
Or, are you asking this list why you should use CentOS even if you dont want to use it ? If that is indeed the question then the answer is simple - dont. Its a free world, you have the liberty to make a choice and use whatever you want.
For that reason, get into my neuronal war and ask you pals. That was the reason of asking what was exactly the difference between centos and redhat. Because if CentOS is completely different to redhat, and though don't have this discriminatory list on it, Cause we believe in open source, no matter that one bad guy set us apart because you consider us. open source permit that in a honestly way (I think).
>
I am a guy that don't want that my infront sidewalk neighbors use my software, but only the same sidewalk houses that are around me. So one modest guy in the houses around rebuild the software I do. They believe in open source and share to all and release them to the worldwide (including the infront sidewalk pals too). The infront sidewalk pals appreciate the modest guy that release a rebuild, even for their comrades in the same sidewalk around whom haven't the money to pay the software. If it is possible that, even people who build a software by any reason don't want to others to use them but release their sources (by now, or in a future close, the modest guy would have to buy in order to rebuild and continue with its noble cause ahead) and permit rebuild of one way or another. So, does the open source permit to those that are no permitted by the main builder to use one software, use the rebuilt software from them, if a rebuilder (that can do it) release it without cost and without that discriminatory list? Thinking so because the modest rebuild is not a work that apply the commercial laws of the sidewalk around of that, that do. Is that right Karan?
Like I said before, you lawyer should have the answers you seek. CentOS is released, as a distro, under the GPL - with packages that have their own individual licenses.
But if there is some type of dependency from redhat that propagates its rules and politics to the rebuilds, feel like all the battle swords of my neuronal war passing through my chest :(
-- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219@icq _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
