On Tue, 2006-08-15 at 14:13 +1000, Mark Strong wrote: > Hi All, after looking around for info on XFS(the filesystem) and its use > on CentOS and/or RHEL 4. There seems to be a lot of noise about 4K > Stacks (especially on linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx). > > So what is the best way to get XFS working with CentOS 4.3 ? And not > have something like this happening. > > A quote from the xfs list at sgi > >On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 at 10:29am, Andrew Elwell wrote > > > >using the 2.6.9-34 centosplus SMP kernel (3GHz P4 with > >hyperthreading enabled) > > > >what we normally (~once a day) is simply > > > >do_IRQ: stack overflow: 416 > >[<c0107a27>] > > >You don't want to use the XFS in the centosplus kernel. It has major > >known issues with 4K stacks (leading to overflows). Use the > >kernel-module-xfs (or somesuch) RPM instead, and you should have better > >luck. > > Do I need a kernel with 8K stacks? > > and is this > > http://dev.centos.org/centos/4/testing/i386/RPMS/kernel-module-xfs-2.6.9-34.ELsmp-0.1-3.i686.rpm > > the "kernel-module-xfs" RPM he was talking about (or equivalent for > `uname -r` equals 2.6.9-34.ELsmp). > > > Regards > Mark Strong > Personally, I would not use xfs on Linux ... maybe take a look here: http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20060814 And see what several debain devel's say about XFS. RedHat says it is not stable enough to use in RHEL. I don't think everyone can be wrong. If you really want to use it, you can use the module you referenced above and our kernel. The standard RHEL kernel will not compile w/ anything except 4k stacks (that is how the CentOS kernel is released too) ... so if you want to do that, you'll need to figure it out.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
