pctech@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > >> Those offers came AFTER the flame-fest began, not before. >> >>No. As was already pointed out, mine was the second reply inviting you >>to post it to the wiki. Revisionist history doesn't work when there's >>an unbiased mailing list archive. > > > > Well, according to the order in which I received the e-mails, the > initial erply was NOT from you, so guess again. You seem to have a problem with numbers. "second reply" isn't "initial reply" - as I already pointed out some mails ago. And you have a problem with attitude. Ralph -- Ralph Angenendt......ra@xxxxxxxxxxxx | .."Text processing has made it possible Bayerischer Rundfunk...80300 München | ....to right-justify any idea, even one Programmbereich.Bayern 3, Jugend und | .which cannot be justified on any other Multimedia.........Tl:089.5900.16023 | ..........grounds." -- J. Finnegan, USC
Attachment:
pgprVON4S9mnP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
