>>>"For those of us who have neither?"
>>
>> Yeah. Because this statement doesn't give the tone of overt hostility at
>all.....*eyeroll*
>
>I see no hostility in someone asking a question that directly acknowledges
>what your original post stated:
>
>"For those of you that either have an older revision of my firewall document,
>or are otherwise keeping track of it, there is a new version available."
>
>He plainly asks what if we don't have the older version or are not keeping
>track
>of it, but are otherwise interested? I think you are reading in to it too
>much.
>Someone not privy to your original thread announcing the document shows
>interest,
>and you basically retort it's none of his business (and less politely I might
>add).
>
>Now who's the elitist?
>
Well, that's not the way it came across.
>Ian
>_______________________________________________
>CentOS mailing list
>CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
>http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
