>Frank,
>
>The glory of Google's gmail has allowed me to view this entire thread in it's
>entirety as well as in thread order.
>
>The first post was your announcement
>The first reply (second post) was from Stephen John Smoogen, who asked:
>
>"For those of us who have neither?"
Yeah. Because this statement doesn't give the tone of overt hostility at all.....*eyeroll*
>
>The second reply (third post) was from Jim Perrin, who stated:
>
>"Would you consider posting it to the wiki to share with all?"
>
>Then, your reply to Stephen (fourth post):
>
>"Then there's no reason for you to fricken reply, is there?"
>
>The your reply to Jim (fifth post):
>
>"I actually had a thread I started in the forums about it, however, I
>stopped monitoring the thread due to people accused me of being an
>e-mail address harvester."
>
>And, the root of all evil, Karanbir's reply (sixth post):
>
>"and who are you ?
>and what / where is your firewall doc ?
>
>- KB"
>
>And, we can conclude that you read Stephen's and Jim's posts before replying
>to
>Karanbir because you reference them in your reply to him (seventh post):
>
>"So far, two of the three replies, yours being one of them, have left me
>with the impression that everyone in the CentOS community is the same as
>the jerks in the forum were. I try to do something to contribute to the
>community and I just get nothing but negativism."
>
>So, chronology and thread index favors the fact that you were the one who
>replied inappropriately and began the flame war.
>
>Ian
>_______________________________________________
>CentOS mailing list
>CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
>http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
