pctech@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > >pctech@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > >> THAT is why I posted to the list. Because I *THOUGHT* that it was > >> usually helpful and good mannered. Apparently there's some secret > >> handshake involved in getting a HELPFUL and GOOD MANNERED response > >> that I am unaware of. Because I got neither until after I'd been > >> flamed. > > > >Stop telling lies. The *second* answer to your mail was an offer to > >host it on wiki.centos.org. The *first* answer to your mail wasn't a > >flame. > > Believe as you will. The FIRST reply to my first e-mail to the list > was NOT a location to post my document. Now where did I say that the first response *was* a location to post your document? Ralph -- Ralph Angenendt......ra@xxxxxxxxxxxx | .."Text processing has made it possible Bayerischer Rundfunk...80300 München | ....to right-justify any idea, even one Programmbereich.Bayern 3, Jugend und | .which cannot be justified on any other Multimedia.........Tl:089.5900.16023 | ..........grounds." -- J. Finnegan, USC
Attachment:
pgpn2oaULXB7I.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
