pctech@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > >pctech@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >>> Etiquette? What etiquette? The FIRST comment out of anyone's >>> "mouth" was "piss off". Where's the etequitte in that? >> >>That's really astonishing. I must have missed that mail, though I >>don't really filter mails. Who said that and where? >> > Piss off was in quotes because it was a paraphrase of the way the > first response anyone made from the list came across. Wrong. The first response was a question about what people who *do not* know the document should do. > >Oh right. Nobody offered you to host that document on > >wiki.centos.org. I must have dreamt that then. > > That e-mail came FAR after people had already started flaming me. It was the *SECOND* response to your mail. There was no "people" involved at that point - there was only Stephen Smoogens question (which you took as a "piss off") and Jim Perrins offer at that time. Ralph -- Ralph Angenendt......ra@xxxxxxxxxxxx | .."Text processing has made it possible Bayerischer Rundfunk...80300 München | ....to right-justify any idea, even one Programmbereich.Bayern 3, Jugend und | .which cannot be justified on any other Multimedia.........Tl:089.5900.16023 | ..........grounds." -- J. Finnegan, USC
Attachment:
pgpvbn3wR2FGD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
