>On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 06:09 -0700, Frank Tanner III wrote:
>> There goes YOUR attitude again. I *SPECIFICALLY* stated in my initial
>> e-mail "or those of you that either have an older revision of my
>> firewall document, or are otherwise keeping track of it, there is a new
>> version available.".
>
>That doesn't work in open communities. If you don't provide a link to
>the document, such message is useless for the hundreds of active and
>passive subscribers to this list. It is important to keep to keep that
>in mind when sending a message to such a large list.
>
>Besides that it often seems better to me to kindly accept critique, than
>to attack others (who have contributed an immense amount of work for the
>community) on their attitudes. It only creates anger.
>
>-- Daniel
>
He didn't ask for a link. He asked who I was and why should he care.
>_______________________________________________
>CentOS mailing list
>CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
>http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
