On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 12:06 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> Frank Tanner III wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 01:36 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> >> pctech@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >>> For those of you that either have an older revision of my firewall document, or are otherwise keeping track of it, there is a new version available. The current version of the document is version 3.1. It's changed rather significantly in some areas.
> >> and who are you ?
> >> and what / where is your firewall doc ?
> >>
> >
> > I am a CentOS user just like yourself. Nothing more and nothing less.
> > My document was initially created for my own use, but after I got it to
> > a sufficiently "useful" state, I figured that others in the Linux
> > community might like it as well.
>
> <-- snip loads of fluff -->
>
> you are still forgetting something... like. maybe a place to get this
> doc ? if you dont have a place to host it - as Jim and Ralph have
> already pointed out perhaps we could move it into the centos wiki (
> wiki.centos.org ).
>
> as for your attitude, its you who seems to have the problem - dont
> expect people to just know you off the email address you use or directly
> be able to make a connection with a doc that is neither available, nor
> ever been mentioned on this list. Everyone here does not have the time
> or the latitude to follow each and every msg also posted in the forums.
> Actually, i might be surprised if more than a handfull of the thousands
> subscribed here actually watch the forums and the lists.
>
> An email that says "ok, I've updated my doc" means absolutely nothing to
> anyone, unless it also includes some relevant info, my questions to you
> were to follow up for such info.
>
There goes YOUR attitude again. I *SPECIFICALLY* stated in my initial
e-mail "or those of you that either have an older revision of my
firewall document, or are otherwise keeping track of it, there is a new
version available.".
How about you climb down off of your high horse and actually READ the
e-mail instead of jumping all over me. I realize that a rational
conversation is beyond some people's capabilities, as it appears to be
beyond yours, but if you don't have anything USEFUL to contribute, why
contribute at all?
>
--
---------------------------------------------------
Frank Tanner III (pctech@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
ICQ: 1730844
AIM: KalokSundancer
MSN: pctech@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
YIM: fbtanner
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
