On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 22:44 +0100, Philip Wyett wrote: > On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 17:21 -0400, Phil Schaffner wrote: > > On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 17:47 -0300, Rodrigo Barbosa wrote: > > > > > Well, I'm still not having firefox problems. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your quite lucky then. Just asking ... have you updated from the > > > base > > > > firefox 1.0.8 or centosplus firefox 1.5.0.2? > > > > > > base 1.0.8 -> plus 1.5.0.2 -> updates 1.5.0.5 > > > > Same update path here - with Dag's freetype-2.1.9-1.2.2.el4.rf - no > > Firefox problems encountered since latest update. > > > > [another] Phil > > I would say it is much preferred to keep with the official upgrade path > and install CentOS updates only. > > I understand people use dag for freetype for certain circumstances, but > it is not the best method for an enterprise OS as freetype is a core > library. For long term, keep the the base OS wherever possible. If you > wish extra features for freetype, let me know and maybe I can roll a > base + these features for centosplus. > > Regards > > Phil OK ... I am cranking out that freetype update now ... hopefully it will fix all these issues ... without having to rebuild anything else :) Thanks, Johnny Hughes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
