Dag Wieers wrote:
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006, David Hrbá? wrote:
David Hrbá? napsal(a):
Well Dag has finally updated the package on 27th. So my advice is really
depreciated. :o)
Hmmm, I guess, I must say rpm --nodeps is not depreciated, Dag has
updated the package, but it's not OK. Dag please update your .spec to
include tinyca2.desktop from upstream
http://tinyca.dyndns.org/cvs-bin/viewcvs.cgi/tinyca2.desktop?cvsroot=TinyCA2
Your desktop file is only English and not even working, links to tinyca...
If you're talking to me, please then include me in the conversation. It's
a coincidence I read this mail. Being subscribed does not mean I read
every single mail.
Those that do are rather amazing.
You're implying that I was already notified of the problem, which I was
not. I just updated the package when a new release was made.
And thank you!
My desktop file is there because tinyca did not include a desktop file
when it was added. That's why it is English only (I do not provide
translation services). If it linked to tinyca instead, people did not
notify me. That's right I do not use tinyca myself (I have used it though)
Know of any other CA out there to try?
so problems inside a package may go unnoticed if nobody informs me.
PS I noticed that a lot of RPMforge users are using this mailinglist to
report problems about RPMforge RPM packages. Please send them to the
proper RPMforge mailinglist. (users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx or
suggest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Not another list to follow! :-P
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
