Rodrigo Barbosa wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 06:36:05PM +0200, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
Rodrigo Barbosa schrieb:
I think most people here use BIND as their DNS server of choise.
I just happen to have updated DLZ patch for the current bind version.
DLZ patch allows you to use mysql (pgsql, ldap etc) as a backend for
zone storage. I make no garantees, of course, but if anyone is interested
on the patch (with or without the specfile for rpm building), please
let me know.
To read more about DLZ: http://bind-dlz.sourceforge.net/
Best Regards,
Hi Rodrigo,
mind you asking whether one should use your bind-dlz patch and not bind
sdb? PNAELV includes SDB within the bind package on current Fedora Core
and newer. Maybe you can point me to a paper?
I actually never heard of sdb.
I'm not even able to find an specific URL for the project, even tho
I've found some pages for specific drivers:
http://www.venaas.no/ldap/bind-sdb/
http://sourceforge.net/projects/mysql-bind/
I'll go and take a look at it, so I can compare.
bind-dlz is far from complete. It only allow queries (no dynamic
updating for you, unless you go directly to the database), the
database is pretty confusing (but it can be easly improved),
and you can't have bind configuration itself on the database.
Maybe sdb will be better. I'll have to check it out.
It would seem that the SAMBA 4.0 project that is adding Active
Directory, will have quite a bit of tying DNS and SQL.
Been a while since I looked in that direction. I only want a SAMBA NT
domain controller.....
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
