On 7/21/06, Jim Perrin <jperrin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> <humor> > So, how many threads before it can go in the faq? > </humor> It'll be there shortly after the whole world peace thing is solved for good. (It's fixed in update 4.. no need for a faq as it'll be obsolete very soon). > Seriously, did I miss it or is Centos@xxxxxxxxxx not covered by Google groups? > If not covered by Google groups, why (or more positively, can we change that)? google query-> site:lists.centos.org <search criteria> or is that not good enough?
Thanks for the U4 info. That Google query is a fine suggestion. Sometimes I just wish there was more uniformity; what works for one list doesn't necessarily work for another list. e.g., IIRC site:postfix.org won't help you with postfix-devel and postfix-users, so your memory (and consequently productivity) is taxed with several swiss army knives rather than one scalpel. OTOH, Google days are much more productive than pre-Google days. rgds/ldv _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
