On Fri, 2006-07-21 at 08:24 -0700, Mark Schoonover wrote: > William L. Maltby wrote: > > _______________________________________________ > > CentOS mailing list > > CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > Well, I tried you suggestion to my previous email, and they didn't work. Are you sure? When I first tried, I thought so too! I had forgotten than sendmail has a feature, "Irritate the user while testing", that delays repeat attempts to contact the remote. It is a progressive delay. Have you done a find on the /var/spool/mqueue? From and end-user POV, "It's broken" may be proper. From and admin/config, it maybe be "Which part is broken?" is proper. There's sendmail itself, it has a mail submission portion, a queue manager and all depends on name/IP resolution (bind usually). This implies a lot opportunities for configs to let you down. > Now, I'm sure it's because I'm not experienced in sendmail. There is only one *experienced* sendmailer in the world! ;-) He justifiably stays in hiding I think! > > Mark > <snip sig stuff> -- Bill
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
