Re: [CentOS] LVM repairing or back to regular ext3?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 00:05 -0400, Paul wrote:
> Can anyone point me in the right direction for correcting errors on an HD
> when using LVM?  I've tried e2fsck and indicates bad block.  I've tried
> with -b 8193, 16384, and 32768 and no good.

Keep in mind that backup super-blocks will differ depending on files
system size (IIRC) and block size (IIRC again) and who knows what? If
your FS is "large" or ... anyway, here my backup super blocks an FS made
as indicated

  ################# m k e 2 f s   &  m k d i r ################
  Filesystem label=/Home01
  OS type: Linux
  Block size=2048 (log=1)
  Fragment size=2048 (log=1)
  524288 inodes, 2097152 blocks
  20971 blocks (1.00%) reserved for the super user
  First data block=0
  Maximum filesystem blocks=538968064
  128 block groups
  16384 blocks per group, 16384 fragments per group
  4096 inodes per group
  Superblock backups stored on blocks:
          16384, 49152, 81920, 114688, 147456, 409600, 442368, 802816,
  1327104, 2048000

  Writing inode tables:   0/128...127/128 done
  Writing inode tables:   0/128...127/128 done
  Creating journal (8192 blocks): done

> <snip>

HTH
-- 
Bill

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux