Feizhou spake the following on 6/6/2006 7:37 PM: > William L. Maltby wrote: >> On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 13:45 +0800, Feizhou wrote: >>> Sam Drinkard wrote: >>>> >>>> William L. Maltby wrote: >>>> >>>>> I need to look more into it, but before I start the long and arduous >>>>> "googling my life away" process, I figured someone might know the >>>>> answer. I've read the man pages several times and they didn't change! >>>>> :-( >>>>> >>>>> <snip> >> >>> most of the 'swapped' data is probably sitting in the cache or buffers? >>> >>> Here is an example: >>> >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=129064 >> >> Thanks to the patience and efforts of all, Rodrigo, Les, Sam, >> Feizhou ... I think I've got a handle on this thing. >> >> The only mistake was turning on "SWAP" in top. >> >> I can see difficulty in programming to get a *meaningful* swap figure: >> that is, one that represents either real swapped memory, or its current >> needs or its potential maximum need. That assumes one can make the >> decision as to which to show. >> >> Others already show (apparently) current swap (free, top's summary >> lines), so what could one put under the "SWAP" column? I now think that >> it was the maximum possible swap needed for each process, as you all >> suggested. > > :) > >> >> Text shared from program segments and libraries, shared data, buffers, >> cache, parts already swapped, parts marked for swap but not committed >> yet,... What would show under the "swap top"? From a programming POV, >> showing anything but the virtual memory use could be complex and have a >> tight coupling to the VM implementation details, increasing maintenance >> for a little used data column too. >> >> I am comfortable that "SWAP" only shows the simplest to obtain value and >> the only problem is that a better explanation is could be provided in >> the man pages for top. > > Eh? I thought that problem kind of exists for all man pages! > >> >>> <snip sig stuff> >> >> And we do know that a fix for the lock up in Sam's and my machine is >> apparently in the pipeline for U4. > > If I was a paying customer.... When upstream opens the floodgates of patches, CentOS will have them within a week, usually less, depending on if they break something. -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't!!!! _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos