On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 18:14 -0300, Rodrigo Barbosa wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 05:00:52PM -0400, William L. Maltby wrote: > > I can't resist. Read the thread that was pointed to on lkml. ROTFLMAO. > > > > *Real* UNIX addressed these problems long ago. I guess the "Gurus" > > suffer from NIH (Not Invented Here) syndrome. > ><snip> > > The "Gurus" need to learn something my father taught me. "A smart man > > learns from his mistakes. A wise man learns from the mistakes of > > others". I'm really smart. :-( And, apparently, so are the "Gurus". To > > think they have VM this long and no one has thought to swipe these good > > ideas from real UNIX. And they're still argueing about all that as if it > > has never been hashed out and addressed before. > > Well Bill, I'm sure they will be happy to receive a patch from you, > with a new VM implementation that actually works (including for SMP > machines, and multiple platforms). > > No ? Well, talk is cheap, isn't it ? Yep. And so is baiting snide commentary. I did my stint and now only write code that I want to. And tolerate idiocy only as I desire. And comment as I see fit. And laugh at irony. And ... well, it doesn't matter does it. Having worked on *IX systems since 1978, I've gained an appreciation for some of the alternatives. And the methods used to accomplish things. > <snip> -- Bill
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
