On Thu, 1 Jun 2006, Kurt Hansen wrote:
> Jim Perrin wrote:
> > Kurt Hansen wrote:
> >
> > > In fact, the quality of the perl-related rpms from Red Hat is
> > > the main reason I'm not using RHEL and using CentOS
> >
> > Your logic is confusing to me. It does not resemble what I would
> > consider to be rational thought.
>
> Is this the kind of rhetoric that is acceptable on this list? There is no
> value to your comment except to insult.
No, it's the kind of rhetoric that should make you reflect on what you've
said instead of going into defensive or counter-attack mode.
So let me lighten the pain:
CentOS is a rebuild of RHEL. So if the perl-related rpms from Red Hat have
a quality problem, the CentOS packages suffer from the same problem.
> Do you have any experience with the rpms to which I'm referring? Do you work
> with the same software I do?
I fail to see why that is relevant in relation to what you stated about
RHEL and CentOS. Although I found Jim's response amusing it should have
caused self-reflection and maybe self-correction, instead of on outburst.
Kind regards,
-- dag wieers, dag@xxxxxxxxxx, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[all I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power]
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
